The Lahore Attacks

In a way, what has happened in Lahore over the course of this year – the terrorist attacks today, the previous attack on the Manawan police academy, the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team — is a microcosm of what is happening to the Pakistani army in terms of client militias turning on their own support base. In the case of the Marriott bombing, the first attack on Manawan and the GHQ attack, the terrorists who’ve been implicated have been associated with the banned sectarian militant organization Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. (The terrorist mastermind Aqeel alias Dr. Usmani associated with Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and captured after the GHQ attack is suspected by the authorities to have been the organizer behind the attack on the Sri Lankan team and the Marriott bombing.)

The problem that the PML-N faces, and the reason why it’s so difficult for it to categorically condemn Punjabi sectarian militias is that the ideological support given to these militant groups has traditionally been from PML’s own power base — the Punjabi Sunni middle class and lower middle class. In 1999, Nawaz Sharif narrowly escaped an assassination attempt masterminded by Riaz Basra, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi’s founder, so it’s not exactly like the news that Lashkar is a danger to Sunni Punjabis is new. But the link between the Sunni urban class of Lahore and sectarianism could explain why, even after being almost killed by the LJ, and facing enormous security challenges from sectarians during his second tenure as PM, Nawaz Sharif could still say something like this, even in 2004:

ISLAMABAD, October 8 : PML (N) leader, Muhammad Nawaz Sharif has strongly condemned the bomb attack in Multan, and has expressed deep sympathy with the families of innocent victims. He said that repeated incidents of terrorism were evidence of not only incompetence but also negligence of the institutions responsible for maintaining law and order. In a statement issued on Friday, he also deplored the attitude of official spokesman and ministers who misdirect investigations with their speculative comments on such incidents. He said it was irresponsible to attribute every terrorist indent to sectarian conflicts, because such observations diverted public thinking from the fact that anti-Pakistan elements in and out of the country had been trying for long to destroy national solidarity.

There seems to still be support for sectarianism in the rank and file of the PML-N. For example, In the recent killings of Christians in Gojra, Toba Tek Singh in which Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Sipah-e-Sahaba militants were implicated, one of the individuals mentioned in the FIR was the PML-N district president for Toba Tek Singh, Abdul Qadir Awan.

Londonstani at the blog Abu Muqawama makes the point that a common theme in Islamist militant outfits is that “the downfall of militancy of this kind is built into its success”. Hopefully this will be the case with sectarian outfits in Punjab. According to Tahir Kamran, an academic at the Government University College, Lahore, as the 90s progressed and Sunni sectarian militias caused more and more trouble in Punjab, public support and donations to their organizations from middle class and lower middle class Sunnis diminished. The problem was, much as in Karachi with the MQM, shopkeepers and the business class had to keep paying these organizations as a means of “buying security” for their businesses. So even though the overt support may have decreased over time, it would take a much longer time to end the local financial backing for these groups. The only silver lining in events like the tragic attacks on Lahore today, is that in the likely event that Punjabi sectarian militias are implicated in them, they can only assist in speeding up this reversal.


4 responses to “The Lahore Attacks

  1. While it is oft-quoted that sectarianism is not longer an issue for Pakistan, it’s startling how grand is still the magnanimity of the issue actually is!
    Granted that the actual, traditional-style open sectarian clashes no longer seem to be occurring on the streets, these terrorist groups have now joined ranks with Talibans to direct their energies somewhere.

  2. Rabia

    good point salman

    you know in a way it shouldn’t surprise us how lashkar-e-jhangvi etc have redefined themselves. the same thing happened with the khatam-e-nabuwat movement in the 70s. A lot of anti-shia extermists like haq nawaz jhangvi originally started out in anti-ahmadi agitations and then moved on to anti-shia sectarianism.

  3. stuka

    24-yr-old sepoy was beheaded in 2000 LoC raid

    New Delhi Nine years after a young Indian soldier on duty at the Line of Control was beheaded and seven of his colleagues killed in a cross-border raid, the Pakistani militant who owned up for the act was reported killed in a US drone strike in North Waziristan last week.
    Indian Army records show that the man who was beheaded in 2000 was Sepoy Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar of the 17 Maratha Light Infantry (MLI).

    Ilyas Kashmiri, according to a report in the Pakistani daily The News, was behind the guerilla attack on an Indian Army post in Nowshera sector in February 2000.

    Kashmiri, a Harkat-ul-Jehad al-Islami (HuJI) commander, was said to have been felicitated by then Army chief General Pervez Musharraf and rewarded with Rs 1 lakh for bringing back “the head of an Indian officer”.

    According to records here, Talekar, the 24-year-old soldier from Maharashtra, was posted at a border listening post — the 24-yr-old sepoy was beheaded in 2000 LoC raid

    Ashok LP post in Rajouri district — that was surrounded by three Pakistani posts when it was attacked in the early hours of February 27, 2000 by Pakistani troops and irregulars.

    The incident took place at time when the two armies were lodged in an intense exchange of fire — small arms and artillery — that was taking place all along the LoC.

    Talekar was on guard duty at the post when a guerilla attack was launched under the cover of heavy mortar and rocket fire from Pakistani positions. He was also the first casualty of the raid — Army reports say his throat was slit by the enemy in a sneak action following which the attackers opened fire inside the bunker, killing seven jawans.

    While Indian troops in nearby posts launched a counter-attack with heavy rocket fire, the intruders slit Talekar’s throat and left behind his decapitated body.

    According to The News, Kashmiri led the guerilla attack on the Indian post with 25 “fighters” — vastly outnumbering the Indians — and returned with the head of an Indian which he “presented” to “top Army officials”. The report recalled that “pictures of Ilyas Kashmiri with the head of a dead Indian Army officer in his hands were published in some Pakistani newspapers”.

  4. It’s been a regular strategy of our government to exploit the overt religiosity of masses, facilitate the making of extremist factions and when the need ends, let them be.
    This has been dangerous in that all of them have resulted, when abandoned, in these groups turning into even more dangerous ones.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: